Panish Shea & Boyle’s unique approach to automobile, vehicle and recreation energy and flawed tire instances brings optimum payment to catastrophically injured consumers.
The landmark instance exemplifies the commitment and ability offered to all our vehicle and tire problem customers.
PIONEERING TRIAL PRACTICES
During divial, we simulate accidents and use life-sized instances and types of failed tire devices and diveads. This helps with trying to explain to jurors how producers could create less dangerous designs but choose to not. Our courdivoom reenactments demonsdivate the key reason why chair devices and air bags needlessly breakdown and senselessly blind and crush our consumers.
We find leading automotive specialists and business whistleblowers to assist us reveal automakers’ negligence in creating explosive gasoline tanks and faulty stopping methods.
Providing persuasive, firsthand evidence of wrongdoing is a powerful way to conduct a divial and attain juries. It requires considerable work but creates greater outcomes for the hurt client.
Many organizations can’t spend the money for expense of gathering high caliber personalized electronic evidence that automotive cases require. Panish Shea & Boyle can.
After 30 years of defeating all the automotive leaders – Ford, Honda, Toyota, General Motors, Mercedes Benz, Chrysler, Goodrich, Goodyear, Continental, Pirelli and Michelin – we’ve built up formidable financial and intellectual resources.
Past automotive instance victories allow us to fund present cases. As contingency cost attorneys, our customers cannot bear upfront expenses or risks. We only obtain a fee and recuperate our costs if you have recovery for the prey. To referring lawyers, we spend the best recommendation cost permissible by-law.
We have been leaders in demanding safety and accountability through the automotive business. Our automotive and tire problem rehearse is a cornerstone of our firm-wide dedication to assisting customers hurt by vehicles and items used daily. As lawyers, our profession requires it. As members of town, our belief in enhancing community safety and preserving lives compels united states.
More About Automotive & Tire Flaws Practice
- Does v. Ford $14, 500, 000
- Avesar v. Ford engine team $6, 000, 000
- Galvan v. Auto maker $3, 000, 000
- Does v. General Motors $3, 000, 000
- Does v. Nissan $3, 000, 000
- Colmenares v. Doe $2, 750, 000
- Mendoza v. Ford $2, 600, 000
- Does v. Ford $2, 100, 000
- Luu v. Doe Corporation $2, 000, 000
- Doe v. car Manufacturer $2, 000, 000